GPS signals at risk

Discussion area for political and legal issues affecting Alaskan salmon fisheries.

GPS signals at risk

Postby Once and Future » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:04 pm

Once and Future
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:59 pm

Re: GPS signals at risk

Postby Monterey » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:07 am

That is why I think mothballing and cancelling the LORAN stations in 2010 was so unwise. what? To save 167 million a year? that less than peanuts, that like a single grain of salt compared to the feast of debt the country is mired in. On top of that it damages our national security to depend on satellites that a singel solar flare can wipe out. i dont like to be so dependent like that without backup.
Monterey
Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:57 am
Location: Sausalito, CA

Re: GPS signals at risk

Postby mydona » Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:29 am

Hurmph... You should have 2 systems on board that will never lie to you and give accurate readings, the radar and depth sounder. Get the dividers and parallel ruler out for a pinpoint location. IMO. GPS is the best invention since caned beans but I feel that the new generation is becoming too dependent and a little "Old School" navigation class is the best back-up. Oh, and by the way USCG regs require a paper chart to be on board so be ready to print those charts from your PC if you've already tossed your hard copies out.
mydona
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:38 am
Location: Thorne Bay


Return to Fisheries Regulations & Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest